<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Pacific Steel &#38; Recycling &#187; energy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.pacific-recycling.com/tag/energy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.pacific-recycling.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2011 19:11:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Low Cost Lighting On Horizon?</title>
		<link>http://blog.pacific-recycling.com/2010/04/09/low-cost-lighting-on-horizon/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.pacific-recycling.com/2010/04/09/low-cost-lighting-on-horizon/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Apr 2010 22:36:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environmental]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[environment]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.pacific-recycling.com/?p=376</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It seems GE has made a tremendous breakthrough in LED lighting. This has the potential of reducing the amount of energy used around the world dramatically. And all this without the mercury involved in CFL lighting. Unfortunately, it appears GE isn&#8217;t thinking of putting these in the hands of middle and lower income consumers. Only [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems GE has made a tremendous <a href="http://www.businessgreen.com/business-green/news/2261059/ge-flicks-switch-era-energy" target="_blank">breakthrough in LED lighting</a>. This has the potential of reducing the amount of energy used around the world dramatically. And all this without the mercury involved in CFL lighting. Unfortunately, it appears GE isn&#8217;t thinking of putting these in the hands of middle and lower income consumers. Only the rich will be able to afford the luxury of curbing their electricity usage.</p>
<p>You see, GE thinks that US consumers will be willing to pay $40 &#8211; $50 <em><strong>per</strong></em> bulb to make the trade. A mid-size home in the US uses about 30 bulbs. Currently, you can buy a package of 4 incandescent bulbs for less than $2. At $40 per bulb, it would cost $1200 to retrofit your home. Anybody just happen to have $1200 sitting around to spend on light bulbs when you could spend $16 instead?</p>
<p>I know, I know, we ought to think more about the environment. The only thing is, most middle and lower income people can&#8217;t afford a lump sum payment that high simple to save a little of the environment.</p>
<p>GE talks in terms of long-term savings, saying the bulbs will last 17 years. Well, in today&#8217;s mobile society, people don&#8217;t stay in the same residence for that long. I guess people will just start packing up their bulbs and taking them with them when they move, provided they have already made the $1200+ investment.</p>
<p>So, GE seems to have gotten it half right so far. Good on them for the invention, now it&#8217;s time to rethink that pricing policy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.pacific-recycling.com/2010/04/09/low-cost-lighting-on-horizon/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hydrogen Power From Water?</title>
		<link>http://blog.pacific-recycling.com/2009/08/13/hydrogen-power-from-water/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.pacific-recycling.com/2009/08/13/hydrogen-power-from-water/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2009 19:44:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environmental]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Add new tag]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.pacific-recycling.com/?p=267</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The concept of turning hydrogen found in water into a fuel source has been around for decades. About 20 years ago, there was quite a stir as university researchers thought they had created a fusion reaction using water that was going to be the safe, no emmisions energy source. Now, a company called BlackLight Power [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The concept of turning hydrogen found in water into a fuel source has been around for decades. About 20 years ago, there was quite a stir as university researchers thought they had created a fusion reaction using water that was going to be the safe, no emmisions energy source. Now, a company called <a href="http://www.businessgreen.com/business-green/news/2247127/controversial-water-hydrogen" target="_blank">BlackLight Power</a> has developed a method for generating heat by moving electrons in hydrogen atoms to move closer to the positely charged nuleus. If they can do it commercially, it will be a truly gigantic leap forwrd. I&#8217;m keeping my fingers crossed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.pacific-recycling.com/2009/08/13/hydrogen-power-from-water/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Now You Can Be An Energizer Bunny Too</title>
		<link>http://blog.pacific-recycling.com/2009/07/24/now-you-can-be-an-energizer-bunny-too/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.pacific-recycling.com/2009/07/24/now-you-can-be-an-energizer-bunny-too/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 21:02:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environmental]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.pacific-recycling.com/?p=260</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This sounds like a pretty good idea. Why not have everybody whose out to burn a little fat create some usable energy in the process? I do have one major concern &#8211; how much energy does it take to create the ReCardio system anyway? Hopefully not considerably more than what it creates. And, is it [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.wasterecyclingnews.com/rss2.html?id=1248447026" target="_blank">This sounds like a pretty good idea.</a> Why not have everybody whose out to burn a little fat create some usable energy in the process? I do have one major concern &#8211; how much energy does it take to create the ReCardio system anyway? Hopefully not considerably more than what it creates. And, is it made of petroleum-based products? This could be a case of one step forward and two steps back. Hopefully not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.pacific-recycling.com/2009/07/24/now-you-can-be-an-energizer-bunny-too/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

