The EPA has proposed adding a window sticker in cars that are for sale that displays a “grade” from A to F, depending on the emissions levels of the vehicle.

Some car dealers support the idea of the sticker, but other car dealers are understandably concerned.  With the economy in such turmoil and car sales in the United States almost at a 28-year low, auto dealers are nervous about the potential for more lost business.   After all, what consumer wouldn’t be concerned if they were interested in a car and saw a “D-“ sticker in the window for some reason?  If a consumer doesn’t understand what the grade is for, it could deter them from purchasing a vehicle that gets great gas mileage on the highway, but whose emissions are a little high on the EPA’s scale.

There are a few important questions anyone can pose regarding the proposed sticker.  Number one, could the sticker create a greater strain on the livelihood of individuals who work at car dealerships?  Number two, if the sticker did create a greater strain on those dealership employees, will the economy benefit or suffer?  Number three, what steps can the EPA take to prevent risking jobs with the unemployment rate so high while protecting the environment and potentially creating a number of “green” jobs?

Any which way you look at it, there are a number of viewpoints that could be argued for or against.

It is important to recognize that the environment should be protected, but it is vital to be realistic about what steps to take to preserve it and when the most appropriate time to take those steps will be.

Either way, Pacific will gladly take your old junker and bale it up for scrap after you upgrade!

The Boeing 787 Dreamliner is a revolutionary new aircraft.  Part of the unique design of this aircraft is that the body of the aircraft is mostly made up of carbon laminate, rather than the traditional aluminum body for an aircraft.  This shift in use of building materials has resulted in a lighter aircraft and has increased fuel efficiency, producing a more environmentally-friendly aircraft.

To date, airlines around the world have placed orders for a combined total of over 800 Dreamliners, although the aircraft is still undergoing flight testing.

Perhaps when the current fleet of aluminum aircraft is decommissioned and carbon laminate becomes standard, someone will decide to recycle the aluminum aircraft to build a home.

We all see the the benefit to recycling electronics. There are some very toxic materials involved in the manufacture of electronic components and while manufaturers are trying to cut out the use of those toxic materials, there is something to be said about replacement materials. Apparently, India’s government is reluctant to ban the use of materials such as lead solder and they are taking some heat for it. However, if you look carefully at their reasoning, you might see that the issue is not so black and white. Once again, we see that as gung-ho as we want to be in relation to taking care of the environment, many times there are other factors that require careful  research first.

If you want to stay updated on ewaste recycling opportunities with Pacific in Great Falls, please visit www.pacific-recycling.com/ewaste !

This might make you wonder if Congress will get upset at losing their status as the main producer of manure. If this technology catches on, we might see farmers and ranchers getting in the business of “producing” manure in order to ensure they have enough to feed their anaerobic digestors. Who would have thought 50 years ago that farmers would also be in the power industry?

No matter what way you try to sell “going green” to businesses, in the end it has to come down to making economic sense. Many environmentalists seem to think we can get people to be greener because it is the right thing to do and if that isn’t your motivation, then there is something wrong.

Take for instance the recent kerfluffle over the climate change bill in the US. Some environmental groups are calling it “Let’s Make A Deal” since it has so much compromise in it. The end product isn’t even near as stringent as they would like. However, they are not looking at it at all from a business standpoint. Businesses still need to make money and there will always be some give and take in negotiations. In this case, isn’t it better to have some progress and hope for more in time?